LenaHuat on 9 June 2008 wrote:This is weird - the weirdest piece of news I've read 2day.
Has any1 seen 'caravans' parked on landed property?? Source : AsiaOne Forum.
Some wise Singaporeans are starting to buy a 'caravan/ moveable port-a-camp' and parked it into their landed property on the wheels.
It is cheap and legal, can be used by just married couple like one bed room HDB size. The structure can last for 40 years and also can withstand earth quake impact, estimated cost is around $50K for a good quality product.
URA should encourage building owners to build a caravan park along the sea side and empty land w/land leased at 30 years. It is a cheap and affordable housing for average Singaporean, why should we buy an expensive condo?...
Be a 'global thinker', learn from the western counter part.
In 2day's BT, the Head (Wealth Mgmt) of UBS Ag revealed that his best investment 2date was his purchase of a piece of land near the old Singapore Chinese Girls' School. I am juz wondering if it would be a good idea to purchase a very old house, raze it down and leave it as a 'garden' and wait for the next upswing of the property cycle.
The Cons : no rental income but hopeful of capital appreciation in some 7-8 yrs' time.
The Pros : cheaper than a built-up house.
However, I suppose I will have to maintain the land so as not to invite visits from those NEA officers. Hence the idea of having a fenced-up garden. I am juz wondering if Singapore has a law, like Perth, that requires a buyer to re-develop the land within 5 years. In Perth's case, it applies to a non-Australian resident.
Does any1 know??