<<I would think that if the Market Maker is rigging things against the retail investors, there would be another group of Professional Traders who would be betting against those Market Makers. >>
W : thanks for the response.
Let's just dwell into the above statement.
Perhaps, if i might be clearer if i explain it this way...
In order to have price equilibirum due to demand and supply, there must be both the demand and supply in laissez-fare manner. In case of asian warrants, there is a fixed level of supply and for any given warrant, the supplier is from ONE issuer. It is liken to a monopoly.
As in shares, you can "short" before owning the shares, and when price drops, one close off the "Short" by buying it back.
In asian warrants, one cannot "short" sell the warrant (correct me if i am wrong here). This "short" selling in actual fact, means "writing or issuing" the warrant. Such "writing or issuing" of warrants are done by the banks or corporations. This "writing or issuing" of the warrant is done when a retail investor BUYs that warrant at the exchange.
After the retail investor close off that BUY position, he is actually "SELLING to CLOSE" off that warrant position.
To Short sell a warrant is to "SELL to OPEN" a position...again, something, one cannot do....
and if this is the case, professional traders cannot take advantage of rigged prices... becos, they cannot "SELL to Open". Effectively, they, like u and me, can ONLY "BUY to Open" and "SELL to CLOSE"
regards
K