by winston » Wed Sep 22, 2021 10:32 am
China Strategy - Assessing Evergrande impact on Chinese financials
The deterioration of Evergrande’s cash flow and liquidity situation has raised market concerns. In this note, we will focus on assessing the exposure and impact on Chinese banks and Chinese insurers.
For Chinese banks, we believe systemic risk on Chinese banking system is relatively low and manageable given that Evergrande had a total of CNY1.2trn total borrowings and trade payables as of Jun-2021, which accounted for around 40bps of total credit in China.
Chinese banks exposure to property developers’ loans varies among different groups with higher exposure for joint-stock banks like China Minsheng Bank and Ping An Bank with around 10% of total loans were property developers’ loan as of 1H21.
The Big-5 state-owned banks had relatively low exposure with property developers’ loans accounted for about 2-5% of total loans.
Also, it is estimated that the size of property financing in banks’ WMP has reduced to CNY2.3trn as of end-2020, representing about 1% of total banking system asset.
Hence, we believe property related shadow banking, represented by bank WMP, is unlikely to pose a major threat to the banking sector in a property downcycle.
For Chinese insurers, conversations with various firms’ management teams post 1H21 results suggest that large listed insurers do not appear to have meaningful positions related to Evergrande.
Ping An’s management has disclosed its total exposure to the property sector is below 5% of its investment portfolio, which implies other listed insurers may have similar single digit exposure due to similarities in their allocation to debt and investment properties.
Listed insurers’ allocation to non-standard assets were estimated at 15-32% of their investment portfolios as of end-June 2021, which is below the industry average of about 37%.
Leading listed insurers’ balance sheets are well-capitalised with solvency ratios meaningfully above regulators’ minimum requirement, which should help the sector withstand near-term market volatility from real estate sector worries.
Valuations of Chinese banks and Chinese insurers are already at bearish levels across any common metrics.
While the concern over property-related risks appears overdone as sectors’ share prices overshoot on the downside, BOS’s base case is for an eventual containment of the contagion risk.
For investors looking to accumulate or average down existing positions, we advise to monitor for further stabilization in risk sentiment in the property sector and bottoming out of Chinese insurers’ new business value momentum, which should still be pressured for the remainder of this year before a gradually improving outlook next year.
For Chinese banks, despite the sector offers relatively attractive forward dividend yield of 8-10%, investors should bear in mind that Chinese banks pay dividend once a year with the next dividend payment will be in Jun-Jul 2022.
We maintain our Neutral stance on banks within Chinese equities. Among Chinese banks, we maintain our preference for those with robust fee income growth and strong retail franchise.
Given the market volatility and concerns that have been highlighted, investors are recommended to accumulate opportunistically on the dip.
Source: OCBC
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"