Singapore - Housing 01 (May 08 - Oct 08)

Re: Singapore - Properties

Postby -dol- » Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:13 pm

k,

HDB flats are just like US$ and US Treasuries - fully backed by the credibility and credit-worthiness of the AAA-rated Singapore govt! The same applies to our S$/local banks/Singapore govt bonds. It's all about confidence. Also, the govt has spoken about enhancing the wealth of Singapore citizens through ownership of public flats. We are counting on the them! ;)

However, I don't think land is scarce in Singapore - neither is it scarce in HK. It is a myth. There are more than enough land in Singapore and HK to house even more people. We can build upwards (technology permitting, even underground). People can be "influenced" into squeezing into smaller spaces... Also, there are still substantial empty tracts of land. Land prices (and by extension property prices) are being controlled/manipulated by the authorities in Singapore & HK (for that matter all over the world). As long as the govt's fiscal position is sound, they are more than capable of dictating how the property picture plays out. Seeing how the US go about influencing the markets and the economy this past decade, I would not write off the power of govt intervention.
Last edited by -dol- on Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
It's not the bottom if you are not crying.

Disclaimer: This is not investment advice! Please do your own research and due diligence.
-dol-
Foreman
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:24 pm

Re: Singapore - Properties

Postby kennynah » Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:20 pm

dol : thanks ...you have just convinced me that i should avoid HDB properties....hahahaha...joke lah...

good to see u again...u've been missing from here for some time.. we all look forward to your posts...
Options Strategies & Discussions .(Trading Discipline : The Science of Constantly Acting on Knowledge Consistently - kennynah).Investment Strategies & Ideas

Image..................................................................<A fool gives full vent to his anger, but a wise man keeps himself under control-Proverbs 29:11>.................................................................Image
User avatar
kennynah
Lord of the Lew Lian
 
Posts: 14201
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 2:00 am
Location: everywhere.. and nowhere..

Re: Singapore - Properties

Postby -dol- » Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:27 pm

k: thanks... the market gyrations have left me so groggy that I decided to take a break.. :?
It's not the bottom if you are not crying.

Disclaimer: This is not investment advice! Please do your own research and due diligence.
-dol-
Foreman
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:24 pm

Re: Singapore - Properties

Postby LenaHuat » Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:57 pm

Hi dol

NRIs - A non-resident Indian (NRI) is an Indian citizen who has migrated to another country, a person of Indian origin who is born outside India, or a person of Indian origin who resides outside India.

PIO - Person of Indian Origin (PIO) is usually a person of Indian origin who is not a citizen of India. For the purposes of issuing a PIO Card, the Indian government considers anyone of Indian origins up to four generations removed, to be a PIO.

India has revised its laws to permit dual citizenship.

NRIs and PIOs now constitute a very sizeable chunk of HNWIs for the local wealth industry.
Please be forewarned that you are reading a post by an otiose housewife. ImageImage**Image**Image@@ImageImageImage
User avatar
LenaHuat
Big Boss
 
Posts: 3066
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:35 am

Re: Singapore - Properties

Postby -dol- » Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:40 pm

Hi Lena,

Thanks for the definitions. These guys have loads to splash around.

Another leg for the local wealth industry... the Indonesians used to constitute a huge chunk of it...as they do for the tourism numbers. The Indians are coming on strong.
It's not the bottom if you are not crying.

Disclaimer: This is not investment advice! Please do your own research and due diligence.
-dol-
Foreman
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:24 pm

Re: Singapore - Properties

Postby LenaHuat » Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:42 pm

Well, this surprises! Wonder who's bidding for this excellent plot of land:
1 August 2008

URA to launch the tender for the reserve site at Kallang Road/Jellicoe Road in two weeks' time
The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) announced today that it has accepted an application from a developer to put up the hotel site at Kallang Road / Jellicoe Road for public tender.

The Land Parcel was made available for sale through the Reserve List System on 23 May 2007. Under the government reserve list system, the government will put up a reserve site for public tender if it receives an application from a developer who commits, by signing an agreement and paying a deposit of 5% of the bid price, to bid for the site at or above the minimum price which is acceptable to the government.

URA has received an application from a developer who has committed to bid at a price of not less than $51 million for the Land Parcel at Kallang Road / Jellicoe Road. In accordance with the procedures of the reserve list system, URA is making public this price. However, the identity of the applicant will not be released.

URA will launch the public tender for the site in about two weeks’ time. The launch date will be announced later. A tender period of about eight weeks will be allowed for the site.
Please be forewarned that you are reading a post by an otiose housewife. ImageImage**Image**Image@@ImageImageImage
User avatar
LenaHuat
Big Boss
 
Posts: 3066
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:35 am

Re: Singapore - Properties

Postby millionairemind » Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:56 pm

Removal of property fee guidelines unlikely to have deep impact
By Wong Siew Ying, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 06 August 2008 2137 hrs

SINGAPORE: Market players said on Wednesday that the move to scrap guidelines on property agents' fees by September 25 is unlikely to leave a deep impact on the real estate sector. But they warned against rogue agents who might try to cash in on the change in rules.

The Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) ruled on Tuesday that the fee guidelines adopted by the Institute of Estate Agents (IEA) should be removed as they are uncompetitive. Under the current guidelines, property agents stand to pocket a commission of 2 per cent of the transacted price.

With the removal of the guidelines, buyers and sellers will be free to negotiate the fee payable to their agents.

Real estate agencies are generally supportive of the move, but they are concerned that the lack of fee guidelines could trigger more rogue practices.

Chris Koh, director of Dennis Wee Group, said: "If the owner is not aware of what the market price of his property is, then he may fall into a trap where the rogue agent says, 'Ok, you want a million dollars, that's what you said you want. I will get you that S$1 million, but if I sell your property at S$1.2 million, then that S$200,000 is for me to keep since there is no guideline that it must be a percentage'."

Another real estate company, Propnex, warned against agents who offer unnecessary services just to quote a higher commission.

Without any fee guidelines, market players said it is down to the agencies to set their own commission structure. Propnex said consumers must assess their agents based on their commitment, track record and knowledge of the market.

Some industry players said the removal of the commission guidelines will not spark a price war because the cost of marketing a property has nearly doubled in the past ten years, and it will not be sustainable for agents to start under-cutting each other.

On average, about 10 to 20 per cent of the agent’s commission goes into marketing efforts, such as taking out advertisements to promote a property. Paying a lower commission does not necessarily mean a better deal as agents may not put in as much effort to sell a property.

Some Singaporeans prefer to sell their properties on their own. Rosanah Mon helped her mother sell her three-room flat at Jalan Bukit Merah for S$230,000, saving over S$2,000 in the process.

"I don't see the necessity (to get a property agent), if you know the procedures well and you follow the guidelines," she said.

In fact, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) said it has seen an increase in the number of such transactions – rising from 5.5 per cent of total resale transactions in 1998 to about 8 per cent now.

To boost greater understanding of the sales procedures, HDB holds monthly resale seminars, with the next one scheduled on September 6. More information is available online at www.hdb.gov.sg.


- CNA/so
"If a speculator is correct half of the time, he is hitting a good average. Even being right 3 or 4 times out of 10 should yield a person a fortune if he has the sense to cut his losses quickly on the ventures where he has been wrong" - Bernard Baruch

Disclaimer - The author may at times own some of the stocks mentioned in this forum. All discussions are NOT to be construed as buy/sell recommendations. Readers are advised to do their own research and analysis.
User avatar
millionairemind
Big Boss
 
Posts: 7776
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 8:50 am
Location: The Matrix

Re: Singapore - Properties

Postby kennynah » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:15 pm

aiyo..... if one has the time, one can actually transact the property purchase/sale, without any agent's intervention... HDB's guideline is very methodical and systematic... just need time and effort....can save so much money...just DIY lah...
Options Strategies & Discussions .(Trading Discipline : The Science of Constantly Acting on Knowledge Consistently - kennynah).Investment Strategies & Ideas

Image..................................................................<A fool gives full vent to his anger, but a wise man keeps himself under control-Proverbs 29:11>.................................................................Image
User avatar
kennynah
Lord of the Lew Lian
 
Posts: 14201
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 2:00 am
Location: everywhere.. and nowhere..

Re: Singapore - Properties

Postby Niczach » Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:57 am

Kenny ,

I still paid 1% commission provided selling price of the house must be higher than market price ........like market value is 250K than i will asking not less than 255K and if agent asking for 2% commission than i will looking for 260K to cover he commission :lol: .......i not the housing agent okay :D more important we must has time . :mrgreen:
Niczach
Loafer
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:51 pm

Singapore - Properties

Postby ishak » Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:47 am

Cooling property market takes a seat at SLA auction
Only four of eight in-fill sites launched for residential use were eventually sold

Business Times, 22 Aug 2008

The wait-and-see attitude that buyers have adopted in the cooling property market was evident at a Singapore Land Authority (SLA) auction yesterday.

Some 200 individuals and small developers packed a room at M Hotel, but there were only a handful of bidders. Only four of eight in-fill sites launched for residential use were eventually sold, for a total of $13.81 million.

In-fill sites are pockets of state land in established landed housing estates that have been left untouched by nearby development or were once used for public purposes. All eight sites came with fresh 99-year leases.

'The response today was very cautious,' said auctioneer and executive director (auctions) at Knight Frank, Mary Sai. SLA conducted a similar auction for six sites last November but sold all the plots then.

Those at yesterday's auction told BT that opening prices were higher than expected. 'I think a lot of people were surprised - that's why there was not much bidding,' said retiree Anthony Tan Ho Peng.

Mr Tan won the bidding for a 4,720 sq ft three-storey bungalow plot in Glasgow Road for $710,000 or $150.40 per sq ft. Bidding started at $680,000, whereas Mr Tan had expected an opening price of $550,000.

According to SLA, the Chief Valuer decides reserve prices for sites, which cannot be awarded if bids are too low.

The timing of the auction - coinciding with the Hungry Ghost Festival or the seventh month of the lunar calendar - could have affected interest. But Ms Sai reckons this was not the main reason. 'Market sentiment is still weak,' she said. And high construction costs could be another concern.

While the auction did not generate heated competition throughout, one parcel received considerable attention. A 15,461 sq ft good class bungalow plot in Ridout Road attracted 34 bids, which drove the opening price of $7.31 million up steadily.

BreadTalk chairman George Quek eventually won the site for $8.96 million or $579.50 psf - the highest psf price of the four sites sold. Mr Quek told reporters that the land will be for his own use.

A three-storey bungalow parcel in Namly Avenue went for $2.63 million or $338.40 psf to Martha Lim. The 31-year-old CEO of Lim Seng Kok Contractor may also keep the 7,771 sq ft site for her own use.

A plot in Tanah Merah Kechil Road was sold for $1.51 million or $346.60 psf.

As for the unsold sites, SLA will work with the Chief Valuer to re-assess their prices. 'If we lower the reserve price, we could release (the site) subsequently,' said SLA's deputy director of land sales, Teo Jing Kok. Alternatively, 'if the feedback is that maybe the site is not popular and there are other in-fill sites, then we will release other sites'.

According to Mr Teo, SLA could hold one or two land auctions a year if market conditions remain steady.
You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else.
- Albert Einstein
User avatar
ishak
Boss' Left Hand Person
 
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:37 pm
Location: Portfolio updated 20080929

PreviousNext

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest