by winston » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:05 am
Vested. From UOB-Kay Hian:-
Already hitting the floor
Based on the past down cycles, Sun Hung Kai Properties’ (SHKP) share price has already fallen below the floor level, as long as residential prices do not decline by more than 20% from here. On the other hand, for investors expecting Hong Kong residential prices to come down by more than 30%, SHKP is still expensive despite the pullback.
As the family rift has come to an end (at least for the time being) management may take some steps to mend investors’ confidence on the Group’s corporate governance.
Sector has been under pressure.
Property developers have been sold down due to
a) the overall weak sentiment in the stock market and
b) downward adjustment on the expectations of residential price movement going forward, prompted by the continuing stock market weakness and rising mortgage rates.
The question is whether share price has adequately factored in the bad news.
Three past down cycles as reference. In order to arrive at an objective answer to this question, we made reference to the valuation of SHKP in the past down cycles. We have identified three such downturns:
1) from Mar 94 to Sep 95,
2) Jun 99 to Jun 00 and
3) Sept 00 to Jun 03.
We left out the down cycles started in 1997 and 2001 as stock valuation fell to an irrational level due to shocks from exceptional events.
Understandably, valuation tends to come down more when residential price decline is sharper. Hence, the discount to NAV widened to 40% in the down cycle started in Sep 00 while it only reached 22% in the downturn from Jun 99.
Street aware of modest profit growth. With the delay in the launch of The Cullinan, SHKP has been selling down its non-core properties, including luxury units such as Hillsborough Court Blk D and Pacific View, and office space such as Millennium P3, to bridge the profit gap. Including HK$500m of disposal gains, we estimate SHKP’s FY08 net profit to grow modestly by 5.3% to HK$12,099m, a tad shy of HK$12.5b among consensus.
Future profits depend on The Cullinan. In our opinion, although SHKP has missed the best time to sell The Cullinan, given its location (right next to ICC) and unchallenged harbour view, we do not think it is overly-ambitious to expect average selling price to reach HK$20,000psf given The Arch nearby is fetching HK$16,500psf in the secondary market at present. This means The
Cullinan alone could bring in pretax profit of at least HK$18b, on a development margin of 80%. Suffice to say, profit levels in the next two years will depend very much on when The Cullinan will be sold and booked.
A balanced asset portfolio. A combination of efforts to build up the rental portfolio and slow landbank replenishment in recent years, only 29% of SHKP’s NAV is exposed to residential properties for sale with over 50% in other Hong Kong assets (mainly rental properties) that generate recurrent income. Likewise in China, SHKP adopts a balanced strategy. Of the 50m sf
landbank, 70% will be developed as high-end residential units and serviced apartments, accounting for 40% of its China NAV. While the Group has started to generate income on its mainland residential projects, we do not expect notable contributions from China till the two major Shanghai
commercial developments are completed in 2010.
Revised target price of HK$133.68. Our NAV of HK$151.91 already takes into account a 10% drop in residential prices from the current level that we expect will materialise within the next three months. Based on the average 12% discount to NAV that SHKP has traded at since 1990, our target price is HK$133.68.
In terms of sensitivity, every 10% correction in residential value will reduce NAV by about 5%. This means even if residential prices were to fall by 20% from now, SHKP would still be trading on a relatively wide 21% discount to NAV. As the family rift has come to an end (at least for the time being), management may take some steps to mend investors’ confidence on the Group’s corporate governance.
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"