by winston » Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:53 pm
Ten months in and Wall St is still too optimistic
By R SIVANITHY
AFTER falling an average of 15-25 per cent so far in 2008, are global stocks now cheap?
For instance, if we express everything in US dollars, the Hang Seng has lost 19 per cent, the STI about 10 per cent, China around 45 per cent and India 35 per cent.
The whole of Europe, in the meantime, is about 15 per cent lower since the start of the year, while the Nikkei 225 and Australian ASX 200 are down about 6.5 and 10 per cent respectively.
With losses of such magnitudes, it would be tempting for contrarians to start wondering if equities represent good value, and to be perfectly honest, they might.
After all, if markets have taken a pummelling over the past 9-10 months ever since the sub-prime crisis erupted in full force, then it would be logical to expect value to eventually emerge.
As always, though, the problem lies with Wall Street. Despite an ever-growing list of woes, US investors and analysts have remained stubbornly optimistic and this has led to the market still being arguably over-valued. Which, as far as investors in this part of the world are concerned, can only be bad news because it suggests that there could be worse yet to come.
Consider the following which some commentators equate to the worst combination of economic factors since the Great Depression of 1929:-
1) the US is facing the biggest property market crash in its history with home prices falling 14 per cent year-on-year,
2) oil is US$135 a barrel or 40 per cent higher in 2008 alone,
3) unemployment is rising (May saw the biggest jump in US joblessness in 22 years),
4) wages are stagnant,
5) food prices have risen sharply,
6) credit has been tightened considerably,
7) the consumer is being squeezed and
8) the Federal Reserve has dropped strong hints that its rate-cutting days are over because, clearly, inflation is rising.
Yet, despite all this, all three major US benchmarks - the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite - have, as of Monday's close, only fallen 10 per cent for the year.
Put differently, the source of the problem for equity markets everywhere has yet to exhibit the same pain that others have suffered.
Of course, such relative outperformance might be justified if it's supported by earnings, but on close scrutiny, this may not be the case.
According to Bloomberg's financial service, the S&P 500 at June 23's closing of 1318 traded at 22 times current earnings and had a dividend yield of only 2.3 per cent - figures that don't offer much hope to the bulls.
However, it is forward earnings that matter and since this figure is a relatively benign 14.4, then US stocks might arguably offer some upside.
It should be noted, however, that even though current earnings per share (EPS) is US$60, the forward consensus estimate is a whopping US$91, which means that on average, US corporates have to report a 50 per cent increase in earnings this year to support present prices. With the many headwinds outlined earlier, this is surely too big a task, especially if interest rates might be raised instead of lowered in the second half.
The equivalent figures for the Nasdaq Composite also point to caution - it sells for 36 times current earnings with only a 0.89 per cent dividend yield and its forecast earnings multiple is 22.7, based on EPS rising from US$66 now to US$105.
The VIX Index, in the meantime, which is a weighted average of implied volatilities of options traded in Chicago but is traditionally seen as an indicator of complacency, stands at around 22, less than half the level of 45 reached during 9/11 or the period that preceded the invasion of Iraq.
In other words, instead of fearing further downside or pricing in a hugely uncertain earnings outlook, Wall Street investors appear to be more fearful of being left out and missing the next big upturn.
Assuming that sooner or later Wall Street faces reality and acknowledges that it has to temper its expectations, how low can it go? A ballpark guess would be a further 10 per cent at least from current levels, which would translate to about 10,700 for the Dow (versus 11,800 on Monday) and 1,200 for the S&P (versus 1,318 on Monday).
Until then, it is likely that stock markets everywhere will remain on tenterhooks and will probably continue to pay the price of Wall Street's overly optimistic stance.
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"